|
This is a complex history and the author has done a great job of pulling together and lucidly presenting a tremendous amount of information from difficult to access sources. Then I came across an interview that the author gave on Democracy Now and immediately, and gratefully, bought the book and read it straight through. As part of our internal training with several immigrant youth 'teen educator' groups, we have used the film on Tuskegee, Miss Evers Boys, as a discussion starter and it was a sobering discovery for me that this was only a small part of the story. Harriet Washington has provided an invaluable and eye-opening tool for anyone working in community health. Highly recommended. I've bought several copies and put them into the hands of the researchers we collaborate with. I coordinate a group of immigrant direct service providers and health care workers which allocates some time to working with medical and public health researchers. My first experience with Medical Apartheid was in a snarky review in the NYT and, sadly, I didn't see past the reviewer's bias.
Washington, "Between 1963, and 1971, a Dr. These companies were also involved in experimentation, and were abusive to these prisoners. Black Sharecroppers were led to believe that the Tuskegee Institute was trying to find a cure for their medical condition, and in many cases the Institute injected/administed Syphilis into them. Boyd deliberately infected both black and white people suffering from neurosyphilis with malaria in order to generate high fevers, which he hoped would kill the syphilis spirochete. Washington is the most astute author today and whether your into the medical profession, political science, a history buff, or conspiracy researcher it doesn't really matter because everyone should read this book to ascertain why things are the way they are, and to find solutions on how to change our attitudes toward one another.There's a plethora of information in this book that will blow your mind. Yep, this happened to Mr.
Also, Insofar as the conspiracy theorists are concerned, they believe that the Vanderbilts (one of the riches families in the world) are an intracate part of a New World Order conspiracy. Futhermore, Dow Chemical Company paid Dr. Sindney Gottleib discarded much of the evidence that exposed the MK-ULTRA project. Elmer Allen of Italy, Texas according to Washington's book. I suggest reading this book for the details to all of this because Washington backs up everything she states with valid source material. This proceedure along with many others would be conducted in front of first year medical students. Mark Boyd who was funded by the Rockefeller Institute, "was testing a novel treatment for neurosyphilis-malaria theraphy. "Fort Detrick's Army Chemical Corps laboratory bred more than four million mosquitoes per day and released them in hordes around Florida." The reason for this Malthusian minded experiment was "to determine whether these droning syringes on (wings could in fact) be used as first-strike biological weapons to spread yellow fever and other infectious diseases, ostensibly among foreign troops during wartime." Many people were infected by these mosquitoes around the Carver Village area.
Kligman to experiment on prisoners in Holmesburg Prison as part of the MK-ULTRA project, which most of it was sponsored by the U.S. Don't pass this book up.FIVE STARS. But alas, by 1973 Dr. Government. One of the weapons developed was "dubbed MK-Naomi. Medical Apartheid is a shocking indictment of the history of the medical profession since slavery to the present.
But the blacks in his experiment seemed to resist infection" So according to Washington, Boyd "infected 470" more Blacks excluding the Whites, but as soon as some of the Blacks began to die off he "resorted to deceit" by conspiring to cover up "their cause of death" by distoring "the death rate of blacks to shroud the fact that they were dying from deliberate infection with falciparum." Which falciparum is a protozoan parasite that causes malaria in humans.Washington, also writes about the 1952 chemical and biological weapons experiment that the CIA and the US Government were developing in Fort Detrick, Maryland. I reiterate read the book for details.For further reading I suggest reading Alex Jones' "9/11 Descent Into Tyranny" because much of Harriet A. Many of these women would die on the operating table. Albert M. Blacks and many Whites were exploited, abused and mutilated over the last few centuries for medical and miscellaneous research in America.
Injecting plutonium in people just to study the affects of radiation and how it developes into certain cancers is abhorrent, iniquitous and disgusting. So, to them it was ethical to conduct sanguinious experiments of this nature out of utter malice.A case in point: according to Harriet A. Heller irradiated the gonads of 131 prisoners in Oregon, including at least 66 [unsuspecting] 'negro volunteers' with radioactive thymindine." Moreover, "Vanderbilt University physicians administered radioactive cocktails to pregnant women in Nashville." This and the other scenarios mentioned are interesting because Vanderbilt University (a private research univeristy in Nashville, Tennessee) was founded in 1873, and it was named after "Commodore" Cornelius Vanderbilt, [the patriarch of the Vanderbilt Dynasty] who provided Vanderbilt its initial $1 million endowment. Just the fact that the Rockefeller Foundation, the Duponts and the Vanderbilts played a part in it should raise your eyebrows. The bottom line is this, most of you readers are probably going to laugh at me for stating this scenario, but after reading this book if you're not convinced of the American Illuminati's existence and involvement in all of this insalubrious activity then I don't know what to tell you.
Washington cites and sources many instances of assault such as physicians performing hysterectomies, and other vaginal surgeries on hapless slaves without any painkillers, or Anesthesia. Plus, I'll never patron buisnesses such as Ringling Bros. Dr. Also, Howard Zinn's "A Peoples' History of the United States" is a good book to reference since "Medical Apartheid" fills in the necessary gaps in his book. Basically in a nutshell this book propagates a very sanguineous history that has been ignored by the masses over the years, from the days of slavery to the present we as a collective have benifited from the suffering of others, but is it ethical is the question. Harriet A. "In fact, (according to Washington's account) in the late 1920's and 1930's, the very period when the Tuskegee Syphilis Study lost its therapeutic arm [it began to mutate into exploitational experiments] in malaria therapy, conducted under the auspices of the Rockefeller Foundation, (which egregiously) was doing worse than allowing blackmen with syphilis to (just simply) die: Researchers were killing black syphilitics outright in order to test a (so-called) theory of treatment." Washington also elaborates that the Rockefeller Institute of New York was involved in late-stage sysphilis experiments.
Washington's research supports Alex Jones' reports as well as many of his documentary films since Washington exposes the eugenics programs in place that are to this day exploiting and experimenting on people to further their Hitlerian goals. Washington also writes about the infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Study in Alabama, which went on from 1932-1972 (according to Wikipedia). and Barnum & Bailey Circus ever again because they used to exhibit Africans like zoo animals in their freak-sideshows. It was believed, or should I say "Whites Doctors who were part of the System" tried to rationalize that Blacks didn't experience pain at the same capacity as they did. Well, Washington demonstrates throughout her thesis that these practices are indeed unethical. The researchers wanted to study the residual effects of Syphilis by simply watching these helpless patients die, then perform autopsy experiments. Additionally, Washington cites that, "the Ferdald School in Walyham, Massachusetts, added radioactive oatmeal to the menus of thirty orphans." This insidious program was sponsored by the Atomic Energy Commission and the Quacker Oats Company.
Moreover, other companies that Kligman was working for at the Holmesburg Prison were Johnson & Johnson, Helena Rubenstein, Merck and Dupont.
pleaase if U come across this book get it. Great book, great stories usually got un-read.
I was disappointed that the terms, "trust," "distrust," or "mistrust" were not indexed in the back of the book. While the contribution of patient preferences to racial disparities in medical treatment is minimized (and, I believe, under-theorized) in the seminal IOM report, Washington's analysis puts a whole new perspective on "patient preferences" as a legitimate source of racial disparities in health care and begs us to develop creative ways to measure it besides our trite attitudinal measures.In all, I still am disappointed that variants of "trust" were not indexed. According to the 2003 IOM report on racial health care disparities, attitudes, or "patient preferences," are only a source of racial disparities in medical treatment IF these preferences are "not based on a full and accurate understanding of treatment options" (Smedley, Stith, and Nelson 2003: 4,32). Some critics of the book have stated that they are unsure whether she is accurately portraying the truth of the history of medical research. This is a rebuttal to the over-reliance of those who perceive that the Tuskegee Syphilis Study is "the" reason for blacks' aversion to doctors and hospitals. Nonetheless, I decided ind to put the book on the list for my qualifying exams--it was to my knowledge the most comprehensive assessment of race and medical experimentation written to date.I finished reading the book from start to finish last week.
However, to be honest, every chapter provides a different (and, at times, new) way to understand the role that trust plays in the clinical encounter. I bought this book last year about this time because I was in the midst of writing a M.A. Thesis focused on racial differences in trust in the patient-physician relationship. First, it demonstrates in a measured manner a persistent pattern of unethical behavior by American scientists and doctors in a wide range of activities (it's not just about graverobbing).
Even with the research I had done on the roots of medical mistrust among blacks, this book came as a shock to me. However, more recent work by Steven Epstein (2007) on the social movement that yielded the NIH Revitalization Act of 1994 and more dated work by Laurel Baldwin-Ragaven, Jeanelle de Gruchy, and Leslie London (1999) on the unethical behavior of South African doctors during this country's apartheid era confirm many of the facts and conclusions Washington herself puts forth in Medical Apartheid. This is in direct contradiction to the predominant public narratives of the 70s and 80s which led to the NIH Revitalization Act--narratives that claimed women and minorities had been excluded from medical research. Thanks for this invaluable piece of work.
Simply put, informed consent--an ethical standard that Washington shows has already been treated as a technicality by medical scientists with regards to blacks involved in non-therapeutic research--is truly in danger of becoming an endangered species.Third, and last, it demonstrates the many ways in which patient attitudes towards the medical institution (typically measured by distrust in medicine, refusal of robust treatments, unwillingness to seek a doctor for a problematic symptom, etc) can and have been shaped by unethical practices that prey on a lack of knowledge on the behalf of the patient and an imbalance of power within the therapeutic alliance. Others suggest that her emotions may have guided the presentation of the material. Washington's analysis gives life to Otis Brawley's warnings that the mandatory inclusion of minorities in federally-sponsored research would lead to "an incentive to give minorities the 'hard sell' when offering enrollment in a clinical trial" (Brawley quoted in Epstein 2007: 95). I read the first and seventh chapters and put the book down because my stomach was deeply disturbed by the books' contents.
Instead, the devaluation of the bodies of socially marginalized racial groups can be seen in every aspect of medicine, even into the roots of how medical knowledge was first formed.Second, it demonstrates that blacks have been routinely (ab)used in medical research and are overrepresented in clinical studies that have no therapeutic value. The things I began reading about last December were too grotesque for them to have actually happened and the dispassion characterizing the medical researchers who went about their work is at odds with the Hippocratic Oath that is supposedly the center of Western medicine. I was deeply impressed that Washington was able to cover the breadth of history without shortchanging the respect due to the grave matters dealt within between the covers of Medical Apartheid. My review will be directed to such responses of the book.I myself had doubts initially.
It should be required reading for all medical students. This is not a book for the faint of stomach or heart. I was astounded at what a physician who was to become head of the American Medical Association thought was appropriate medical research.
|
